Attorneys for Bob Dylan have formally denied allegations of youngster sexual abuse created towards him in a lawsuit from an nameless lady submitted in August 2021.
The lawsuit statements that Dylan groomed the girl, referred to as JC, when she was 12 decades old and sexually abused her. Dylan, it is claimed, aimed to “lower her inhibitions with the item of sexually abusing her, which he did, coupled with the provision of medications, alcoholic beverages and threats of bodily violence, leaving her emotionally scarred and psychologically harmed to this day”.
JC originally alleged that the abuse took position over a six-week time period in 1965, which includes at New York’s Chelsea Resort. Previous 7 days, the lawsuit was amended to point out that the alleged abuse took position in excess of “several months”.
Dylan’s lawful team have responded to the amendment with a submitting of their individual, contacting the lawsuit “a brazen shakedown … wrong, malicious, reckless and defamatory”. It goes on: “Mr Dylan will not be extorted. Mr Dylan will vigorously defend himself against these lawyer-driven lies and request redress in opposition to all those people responsible, like by looking for monetary sanctions towards people responsible for production and bringing this abusive lawsuit.”
They assert that JC “told a really various story about her alleged interactions with Mr Dylan to a journalist, Mr Daryl Sanders, in 2017”, and try to discredit JC by highlighting her operate as a psychic. JC’s lawyer Peter Gleason responded, declaring: “Neither my client or her counsel are going to be bullied. Additional than 50 percent of Us residents believe in psychic phenomena. If you’re going to assault anyone for their beliefs, you are encroaching on very unsafe territory. This is what this state is centered on, independence of beliefs. It shouldn’t divert our consideration from the allegations. This circumstance is about the specifics.”
Her allegations, such as the new timeframe, are also explained by Dylan’s legal professionals as a “chronological impossibility”, one thing also claimed by other individuals in the wake of the preliminary submitting. The songs writer Clinton Heylin said it was “not possible” that Dylan was in New York for extensive ample during the first alleged timeframe, expressing that the singer was in England, Los Angeles and Woodstock in rural New York.
One more law firm for JC claimed in August that Dylan’s itinerary was “not inconsistent with our client’s promises. There are dates that he was not touring for several months in April and this will all come out at that ideal time. The claims had been vetted ahead of the scenario was submitted and we did our investigation. It’s our placement that the evidence will establish that he was in New York during the applicable time time period.”
No listening to date has but been established for the circumstance.